Appointing an expat CEO, for traditional Indian companies, has always been a high stakes game, especially as their being ‘culture unfriendly’ is a huge disadvantage! Then why do Indian companies still take expat CEOs? Any valuable lessons yet?
As the troubled General Motors was busy finalising its restructuring process and doing some heavy duty pondering over hard decisions of retaining and shedding various brands under its vast portfolio post the bankruptcy filing under Chapter 11, home-grown Tata Motors was keeping a close eye on the developments. Around the same period, Carl-Peter Forster, President of GM’s European operations, had a decision to make of his own; one, a bigger job at General Motors – perhaps even the global head – and, two, becoming Group CEO of Tata Motors. Having worked at companies like GM, BMW and McKinsey, the Tatas knew that if Forster could be convinced, he would bring a lot of valuable experience on the table. For the London-born Forster (raised in Bonn and Athens, worked across the globe), India could promise to be an enlightening experience. But Forster also knew that if he were to join the Tatas, however hard he tries, he would – by rote nomenclature – be known as an ‘Expat CEO’ (short for expatriate CEO). Along with the bouquets that accompany this garnishing, Forster would have had the benefit of being brandished with the standard ignominious accusations reserved with honour for expat CEOs. But really, why do typically Indian companies take expat CEOs in the first place? Are there any lessons?
To be fair, this is not the first case of an Indian company headhunting for an expat CEO; and it definitely won’t be the last. In fact, the Tata group itself has believed heavily in global talent for top positions; which is logical since a huge 65% of the group’s revenues come from overseas markets. Raymond Bickson, MD, Indian Hotels (of the Tata Group), contributed heavily to the company’s global expansion through innovative acquisitions and tie ups with luxury hotel chains and cruise lines. But taking in Daryl Green as MD of Tata Teleservices wasn’t as rewarding as Green quit in two years, citing personal reasons and amid rumours attributing his resignation to his inability to mingle with the culture of the Tata Group.
As the troubled General Motors was busy finalising its restructuring process and doing some heavy duty pondering over hard decisions of retaining and shedding various brands under its vast portfolio post the bankruptcy filing under Chapter 11, home-grown Tata Motors was keeping a close eye on the developments. Around the same period, Carl-Peter Forster, President of GM’s European operations, had a decision to make of his own; one, a bigger job at General Motors – perhaps even the global head – and, two, becoming Group CEO of Tata Motors. Having worked at companies like GM, BMW and McKinsey, the Tatas knew that if Forster could be convinced, he would bring a lot of valuable experience on the table. For the London-born Forster (raised in Bonn and Athens, worked across the globe), India could promise to be an enlightening experience. But Forster also knew that if he were to join the Tatas, however hard he tries, he would – by rote nomenclature – be known as an ‘Expat CEO’ (short for expatriate CEO). Along with the bouquets that accompany this garnishing, Forster would have had the benefit of being brandished with the standard ignominious accusations reserved with honour for expat CEOs. But really, why do typically Indian companies take expat CEOs in the first place? Are there any lessons?
To be fair, this is not the first case of an Indian company headhunting for an expat CEO; and it definitely won’t be the last. In fact, the Tata group itself has believed heavily in global talent for top positions; which is logical since a huge 65% of the group’s revenues come from overseas markets. Raymond Bickson, MD, Indian Hotels (of the Tata Group), contributed heavily to the company’s global expansion through innovative acquisitions and tie ups with luxury hotel chains and cruise lines. But taking in Daryl Green as MD of Tata Teleservices wasn’t as rewarding as Green quit in two years, citing personal reasons and amid rumours attributing his resignation to his inability to mingle with the culture of the Tata Group.
Read these article :-
Outlook Magazine money editor quits
Don't trust the Indian Media!
No comments:
Post a Comment