Officials promoting Obama’s Drone programme continue to churn out the same old rhetoric of how grateful those in the tribal areas are every time a Drone strike is launched on Waziristan. Well I have news for the White House. Open your eyes, stop being in the denial mode and listen to the voices of Internally Displaced Persons (IDP’s) from Pakistan’s South Waziristan Agency (SWA), currently camped in front of the National Press Club in Islamabad on a hunger strike.
“The IDPs from Mehsud tribe have demanded an immediate halt to US Drone strikes and prolonged military operations in SWA which was launched in 2009 against the Tehreek-e-Taliban Pakistan (TTP). Protestors are vowing to continue their protest until the halt of military operations, which has resulted in the mass displacement of many (civilians ) from the region,” Saleem Mehsud, a Waziristan-based journalist said.
Last week, Farzarna Bari, Human Right Activists, Pakistan, Tehreek-e-Insaaf leader from SWA, Doost Mohammad Khan and elders of the Mehsud tribe participated in the protest camp. The IDPs stated that the Pakistan government should also take the matter seriously because “the coming generation of the Mehsud tribe are facing immense problems and are being deprived of basic facilities as a result of military operations”.
Advocate, Sherpao Khan Mehsud said the sit-in would continue until their demands were met. He said that drone attacks were not only killing innocents but were also violating the sovereignty of Pakistan. Mehsud Youth President, Jamal Shah stressed that “the military operation should be stopped immediately in which houses, markets, schools and colleges had been destroyed.” He also said the military operation “Rah-e-Nijaat” was started in 2009 in Waziristan and now hundreds have been forced into slums and living in terrible conditions.
The Mehsuds are not alone in calling for an end to drone strikes. I spoke to two members of the Wazir tribe. Arman Khan Wazir told me, “I am from Waziristan and because of drones, people are turning against the Pakistan Army and America. Children are joining Taliban because they have no facilities and they are becoming destructive minded. I can’t explain the destruction there in words.”
Imran Khan has long condemned drone attacks calling them a violation of international laws which also violate Pakistan’s sovereignty and is calling for America to identify the victims of drone strikes. He also criticised the government saying it had turned the country into a “Banana Republic” and that US authorities “were allowed to hit and kill any civilian at will inside Pakistani territory”.
Always quick to be on the scene for peaceful protestors, a tweet from Imran Khan read, “my full support for our FATA youth protesting drone attacks in front of Islamabad Press Club. Will try to go personally to join their protest.”
Says activist Raheem Ullah Wazir, “if we start doling out justice from the skies than we should get rid of the courts from the world. If someone is a culprit, he should be brought out into the open so that truth and reality is known to the world. Secondly, where is the sanctity of international borders? This is going to set a very wrong precedent. The money that is invested in drone technology could have been used to seal the Pakistan-Afghanistan border to keep out insurgents, if any.”
In an email, Hanif Ullaha, a Peshawar-based journalist, highlighted his arguments against the use of drones in an email to me, laying out the following points: it is illegal, induces collateral damage, abuses international law and norms for strike, is counterproductive and there is rampant extrajudicial killing... if Nazis could be brought to trial and prosecuted, why are the killers being allowed to get away scot free here.
I asked several people whether drones radicalized young people in the tribal areas and the answer was an unanimous “yes”. A man (name withheld) told me, “They take their revenge on the Pakistan army and get closer to Al Qaeda”. He admitted that he himself had considered joining the Taliban after the drone strikes but decided to stick to his studies.
It is important to note that a recent bombing of an army checkpoint which killed 35 people was claimed by Taliban to be in retaliation for the killing of two of its commanders by drone strikes. I argue that these “secondary” drone victims should also be added to the death figures to present a true picture of the impact of warfare. The Taliban also attacked the Pakistan government for what it called its “complicity” in drone strikes.
“The IDPs from Mehsud tribe have demanded an immediate halt to US Drone strikes and prolonged military operations in SWA which was launched in 2009 against the Tehreek-e-Taliban Pakistan (TTP). Protestors are vowing to continue their protest until the halt of military operations, which has resulted in the mass displacement of many (civilians ) from the region,” Saleem Mehsud, a Waziristan-based journalist said.
Last week, Farzarna Bari, Human Right Activists, Pakistan, Tehreek-e-Insaaf leader from SWA, Doost Mohammad Khan and elders of the Mehsud tribe participated in the protest camp. The IDPs stated that the Pakistan government should also take the matter seriously because “the coming generation of the Mehsud tribe are facing immense problems and are being deprived of basic facilities as a result of military operations”.
Advocate, Sherpao Khan Mehsud said the sit-in would continue until their demands were met. He said that drone attacks were not only killing innocents but were also violating the sovereignty of Pakistan. Mehsud Youth President, Jamal Shah stressed that “the military operation should be stopped immediately in which houses, markets, schools and colleges had been destroyed.” He also said the military operation “Rah-e-Nijaat” was started in 2009 in Waziristan and now hundreds have been forced into slums and living in terrible conditions.
The Mehsuds are not alone in calling for an end to drone strikes. I spoke to two members of the Wazir tribe. Arman Khan Wazir told me, “I am from Waziristan and because of drones, people are turning against the Pakistan Army and America. Children are joining Taliban because they have no facilities and they are becoming destructive minded. I can’t explain the destruction there in words.”
Imran Khan has long condemned drone attacks calling them a violation of international laws which also violate Pakistan’s sovereignty and is calling for America to identify the victims of drone strikes. He also criticised the government saying it had turned the country into a “Banana Republic” and that US authorities “were allowed to hit and kill any civilian at will inside Pakistani territory”.
Always quick to be on the scene for peaceful protestors, a tweet from Imran Khan read, “my full support for our FATA youth protesting drone attacks in front of Islamabad Press Club. Will try to go personally to join their protest.”
Says activist Raheem Ullah Wazir, “if we start doling out justice from the skies than we should get rid of the courts from the world. If someone is a culprit, he should be brought out into the open so that truth and reality is known to the world. Secondly, where is the sanctity of international borders? This is going to set a very wrong precedent. The money that is invested in drone technology could have been used to seal the Pakistan-Afghanistan border to keep out insurgents, if any.”
In an email, Hanif Ullaha, a Peshawar-based journalist, highlighted his arguments against the use of drones in an email to me, laying out the following points: it is illegal, induces collateral damage, abuses international law and norms for strike, is counterproductive and there is rampant extrajudicial killing... if Nazis could be brought to trial and prosecuted, why are the killers being allowed to get away scot free here.
I asked several people whether drones radicalized young people in the tribal areas and the answer was an unanimous “yes”. A man (name withheld) told me, “They take their revenge on the Pakistan army and get closer to Al Qaeda”. He admitted that he himself had considered joining the Taliban after the drone strikes but decided to stick to his studies.
It is important to note that a recent bombing of an army checkpoint which killed 35 people was claimed by Taliban to be in retaliation for the killing of two of its commanders by drone strikes. I argue that these “secondary” drone victims should also be added to the death figures to present a true picture of the impact of warfare. The Taliban also attacked the Pakistan government for what it called its “complicity” in drone strikes.
For More IIPM Info, Visit below mentioned IIPM articles
Ranked 1st in International Exposure (ahead of all the IIMs)
Ranked 6th Overall
Zee Business Best B-School Survey 2012
Prof. Arindam Chaudhuri’s Session at IMA Indore
IIPM IN FINANCIAL TIMES, UK. FEATURE OF THE WEEK
IIPM strong hold on Placement : 10000 Students Placed in last 5 year
| BBA Management Education |
